boobookittyf*ck
Sep. 23, 2006. 09:22 PM
What rights do they have, and what rights should/shouldn't they have? Discuss.
By discuss I obviously mean agree with me.
Cyrrylia
Sep. 24, 2006. 11:21 AM
You have not put out a position, how is anybody supposed to agree with you?
Depending on how you look at it, Gays already have the same rights as everybody else.
ThyThoutrust
Sep. 24, 2006. 11:36 AM
QUOTE(Cyrrylia @ Sep 24 2006, 11:21 AM) [snapback]2674[/snapback]
You have not put out a position, how is anybody supposed to agree with you?
Depending on how you look at it, Gays already have the same rights as everybody else.
Agreed.
They have the same rights than you and me, if someone hates Gays and think they don't have the same rights....Is that a human rights violation?
Inder
Sep. 24, 2006. 11:40 AM
I agree with you two. If they don't have the same rights, thats just like being back in the 50's when inequality was in full throttle. Anyone whos against gay rights is just afraid of change.
The Voice
Sep. 24, 2006. 12:42 PM
I hope this whole gay rights thing won't be as violent as the civil rights movement.
Psybadek
Sep. 25, 2006. 11:38 AM
The way the country is going the only place gays will not have any rights is in church.
rainydaze
Sep. 25, 2006. 11:43 AM
everyone has equal rights. its called human rights sexual preference should not change that. the only place they arnt accepted is chuches and shit but the churches should be allowed to refused their marriage cerimonies because it goes against their religion. but if someone will preform the ceremonies for gays thenall the power to them. i know lots of gays and they are just like regualr people.
ThyThoutrust
Sep. 25, 2006. 03:47 PM
QUOTE(Psybadek @ Sep. 25, 2006. 11:38 AM) [snapback]3747[/snapback]
The way the country is going the only place gays will not have any rights is in church.
And that's a good thing, I don't see how you can be gay and believe in god?! Why would you mary someone if you're gay? I mean, of course, I'm for gay mariage, but... Why would someone believe in a God that is against gays if that person is actualy gay?
Psybadek
Sep. 26, 2006. 01:14 AM
Im sure there are some gays who believe in God.
Murmelbahn
Sep. 26, 2006. 07:19 AM
Of course there are..., the protestants accept gay mariages... why shouldn't they believe in god? there is almost just the pope and some other crazy but important person who are against gay mariage... most of the katholics in europe don't "believe in" the pope and his strange views....
Boxiom
Sep. 27, 2006. 03:33 AM
Honestly, who gives a fuck if somebody is gay and wants to get married. How the fuck does that hurt anyone(besides homofobes).
Why the fuck is there a law about that shit anways, its so stupid..
(and no im not gay)
Psybadek
Sep. 27, 2006. 12:55 PM
Well when the United States was founded, it was founded on christian beliefs, so to this day, like it or not America has laws based on Christian beliefs.
Sidd
Sep. 27, 2006. 12:59 PM
One against them would only be
QUOTE
Do not take advantage of the dropped soap position
Conkerzilla
Sep. 27, 2006. 07:16 PM
we should dump them in a town, so they can all be gay together, and they'll leave the rest of us alone, i told people my idea, they called my prejudice....
ThyThoutrust
Sep. 27, 2006. 07:17 PM
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 27, 2006. 07:16 PM) [snapback]6687[/snapback]
we should dump them in a town, so they can all be gay together, and they'll leave the rest of us alone, i told people my idea, they called my prejudice....
a town? you mean a whole city....We could give them New-York.
Conkerzilla
Sep. 27, 2006. 07:21 PM
QUOTE(ThyThoutrust @ Sep. 27, 2006. 08:17 PM) [snapback]6690[/snapback]
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 27, 2006. 07:16 PM) [snapback]6687[/snapback]
we should dump them in a town, so they can all be gay together, and they'll leave the rest of us alone, i told people my idea, they called my prejudice....
a town? you mean a whole city....We could give them New-York.
ya, fuck new york, who needs it. we should put electric fences around it and have a building every so often in case someone turned straight again theyd be released, i think givin em ne york will be best for us and the fags!
Cyrrylia
Sep. 27, 2006. 08:18 PM
QUOTE
Well when the United States was founded, it was founded on christian beliefs, so to this day, like it or not America has laws based on Christian beliefs.
Why do you not go over and look at the constitution. This is not the Confederate states. No mention of G-d exists. The Framers did this on purpose.
Conkerzilla
Sep. 28, 2006. 03:02 PM
QUOTE(Cyrrylia @ Sep. 27, 2006. 09:18 PM) [snapback]6763[/snapback]
QUOTE
Well when the United States was founded, it was founded on christian beliefs, so to this day, like it or not America has laws based on Christian beliefs.
Why do you not go over and look at the constitution. This is not the Confederate states. No mention of G-d exists. The Framers did this on purpose.
look at a dollar bill. "In god we trust"
ThyThoutrust
Sep. 28, 2006. 03:07 PM
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 27, 2006. 07:21 PM) [snapback]6694[/snapback]
QUOTE(ThyThoutrust @ Sep. 27, 2006. 08:17 PM) [snapback]6690[/snapback]
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 27, 2006. 07:16 PM) [snapback]6687[/snapback]
we should dump them in a town, so they can all be gay together, and they'll leave the rest of us alone, i told people my idea, they called my prejudice....
a town? you mean a whole city....We could give them New-York.
ya, fuck new york, who needs it. we should put electric fences around it and have a building every so often in case someone turned straight again theyd be released, i think givin em ne york will be best for us and the fags!
I just meant that they were too much to put in a town...
I don't agree with you though...
JackMehoff
Sep. 28, 2006. 03:09 PM
I don't think they should get married.
Personally I hate gay people, but that's just me.
-N-
Sep. 28, 2006. 03:47 PM
QUOTE(JackMehoff @ Sep. 29, 2006. 03:09 AM) [snapback]7709[/snapback]
I don't think they should get married.
Personally I hate gay people, but that's just me.
Why shouldnt they be allow to marry?
and what reason do you have to hate them?
ungrantedxwish
Sep. 28, 2006. 03:51 PM
QUOTE(ThyThoutrust @ Sep. 27, 2006. 10:17 PM) [snapback]6690[/snapback]
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 27, 2006. 07:16 PM) [snapback]6687[/snapback]
we should dump them in a town, so they can all be gay together, and they'll leave the rest of us alone, i told people my idea, they called my prejudice....
a town? you mean a whole city....We could give them New-York.
Wouldn't San Francisco be more fitting?
I'm for gay rights of marriage, etc.
Sidd
Sep. 28, 2006. 04:23 PM
One bad thing about homosexuality is lesbians... first off we already have enough competition with other dudes but now chicks marry other chicks!?!?
thats why I like bisexual chicks only! and straight ones of course
ThyThoutrust
Sep. 28, 2006. 06:44 PM
QUOTE(Sidd @ Sep. 28, 2006. 04:23 PM) [snapback]7796[/snapback]
One bad thing about homosexuality is lesbians... first off we already have enough competition with other dudes but now chicks marry other chicks!?!?
thats why I like bisexual chicks only! and straight ones of course
One day,
You'll understand that bisexuality is rarer than what you see in porn.
Cyrrylia
Sep. 28, 2006. 07:57 PM
This is funny. Many people here are like "Gays are fine!" but over in the gender selection thread, everybody is like "Its teh evil!!"
You realise Homosexuality is unnatural in that is counter-productive to reproduction, the point of nature. So if Gender choosing is bad because it is unnatural, so is Homosexuality.
Before any of you BS me some more, realise that selecting gender does nothing at all to genes, nor has any negative consequences. Unlike buttsex between fags, which can tear the rectum, introduce germs to places they should not be, and of course, AIDs is significantly higher among male homosexuals than anybody else.
Conkerzilla
Sep. 28, 2006. 08:15 PM
QUOTE(Cyrrylia @ Sep. 28, 2006. 08:57 PM) [snapback]7992[/snapback]
This is funny. Many people here are like "Gays are fine!" but over in the gender selection thread, everybody is like "Its teh evil!!"
You realise Homosexuality is unnatural in that is counter-productive to reproduction, the point of nature. So if Gender choosing is bad because it is unnatural, so is Homosexuality.
Before any of you BS me some more, realise that selecting gender does nothing at all to genes, nor has any negative consequences. Unlike buttsex between fags, which can tear the rectum, introduce germs to places they should not be, and of course, AIDs is significantly higher among male homosexuals than anybody else.
honestly, gays freak me out, the way they talk, dress, act, i wnat them dead, i wanna cut em....but id be called prejudice and some dumb shit so i tend not to post things like i have just posted
Evil_thing_999
Sep. 28, 2006. 08:38 PM
I don't really care about gays. As long as they don't touch me or get in my way. But the same can be said for most people, I pretend to care, but I don't really.
"Some lady was hit by a car the other day!"
"ORLY I don't care."
"Gays are/aren't allowed to marry!"
"ORLY? I don't care."
Erin
Sep. 28, 2006. 09:08 PM
QUOTE(boobookittyf*ck @ Sep. 23, 2006. 10:22 PM) [snapback]2181[/snapback]
What rights do they have, and what rights should/shouldn't they have? Discuss.
By discuss I obviously mean agree with me.
The same rights as everyone else.
simple as that.
Conkerzilla
Sep. 29, 2006. 02:58 PM
I still think they shouldnt be able to adopt kids, or have custody over their kids from a previous straight marriage, if their gay, that's fine, but they shouldnt exactly be able raise a kid as such.
dreamstar
Sep. 29, 2006. 03:08 PM
People who are gay are people to, there is nothing wrong with them. Hey have the same parts as everyone else. We has humans shouldn't see them any differently.
Conkerzilla
Sep. 29, 2006. 03:14 PM
QUOTE(dreamstar @ Sep. 29, 2006. 04:08 PM) [snapback]8862[/snapback]
People who are gay are people to, there is nothing wrong with them. Hey have the same parts as everyone else. We has humans shouldn't see them any differently.
i think they shouldnt be allowed to raise a child, just as the lead singer of cradle of filth shouldnt be allowed to raise a child, their to much of a bad influence.
Erin
Sep. 29, 2006. 03:40 PM
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 29, 2006. 03:58 PM) [snapback]8854[/snapback]
I still think they shouldnt be able to adopt kids, or have custody over their kids from a previous straight marriage, if their gay, that's fine, but they shouldnt exactly be able raise a kid as such.
Are you kidding? What, they aren't fit to be parents because they have a different sexual preference? Thats bullshit man.
My sister used to nanny for a lesbian couple. Guess what...on Mother's Day, the kid made two mother's day cards.
I believe that with [hopefully] with time, everyone will just become accepting enough to not judge someone based on sexual preference. Why on earth should a gay couple who love each other be denied the chance to adopt a child? It makes no sense to me, and sounds rediculous.
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 29, 2006. 04:14 PM) [snapback]8867[/snapback]
QUOTE(dreamstar @ Sep. 29, 2006. 04:08 PM) [snapback]8862[/snapback]
People who are gay are people to, there is nothing wrong with them. Hey have the same parts as everyone else. We has humans shouldn't see them any differently.
i think they shouldnt be allowed to raise a child, just as the lead singer of cradle of filth shouldnt be allowed to raise a child, their to much of a bad influence.
yeah good job. So the government should go around and sterilize any person who is not 'socially acceptable'.
We got the next hitler on our hands?
angelaxsaurus
Sep. 29, 2006. 03:50 PM
gays and bi's dont bother me. Perosanlly wen i see guys making out together its a turn on. I think its fine and gays getting married is fine to me too. The only thing i dont agree upon is the fact of gays actually adopting kids. I just feel bad for the kid to grow up with 2 mothers or two fathers there gonna get made fun of and idk its just not right.
dreamstar
Sep. 29, 2006. 04:01 PM
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 29, 2006. 04:14 PM) [snapback]8867[/snapback]
QUOTE(dreamstar @ Sep. 29, 2006. 04:08 PM) [snapback]8862[/snapback]
People who are gay are people to, there is nothing wrong with them. Hey have the same parts as everyone else. We has humans shouldn't see them any differently.
i think they shouldnt be allowed to raise a child, just as the lead singer of cradle of filth shouldnt be allowed to raise a child, their to much of a bad influence.
The only reason why I agree with you is because they have done a study about gays and lesbians adopting children and it has been said that it is better for them not to have children.
Conkerzilla
Sep. 29, 2006. 04:52 PM
QUOTE(Erin @ Sep. 29, 2006. 04:40 PM) [snapback]8894[/snapback]
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 29, 2006. 03:58 PM) [snapback]8854[/snapback]
I still think they shouldnt be able to adopt kids, or have custody over their kids from a previous straight marriage, if their gay, that's fine, but they shouldnt exactly be able raise a kid as such.
Are you kidding? What, they aren't fit to be parents because they have a different sexual preference? Thats bullshit man.
My sister used to nanny for a lesbian couple. Guess what...on Mother's Day, the kid made two mother's day cards.
I believe that with [hopefully] with time, everyone will just become accepting enough to not judge someone based on sexual preference. Why on earth should a gay couple who love each other be denied the chance to adopt a child? It makes no sense to me, and sounds rediculous.
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 29, 2006. 04:14 PM) [snapback]8867[/snapback]
QUOTE(dreamstar @ Sep. 29, 2006. 04:08 PM) [snapback]8862[/snapback]
People who are gay are people to, there is nothing wrong with them. Hey have the same parts as everyone else. We has humans shouldn't see them any differently.
i think they shouldnt be allowed to raise a child, just as the lead singer of cradle of filth shouldnt be allowed to raise a child, their to much of a bad influence.
i dont meen to be seist or anything, but im pretty sure girls tend to be better at mothering, then 2 guys, it might sound sexist, but its pretty much true.
yeah good job. So the government should go around and sterilize any person who is not 'socially acceptable'.
We got the next hitler on our hands?
i dont meen to be sexist or anything, but im pretty sure girls tend to be better at mothering, then 2 guys, it might sound sexist, but its pretty much true.
lol, hitler, i just think if youre a guy and run around and act like a girl, you shouldnt exactly be raising a kid.
And the if your dads cradle of filths lead singer, thats even worse, lol, its like "What did you do this summer jimmy?" "oh, i just watched my dad kill sheep, praise satan, and have a few blood origys, nothing special"
lol
Cyrrylia
Sep. 29, 2006. 05:20 PM
QUOTE
i dont meen to be sexist or anything, but im pretty sure girls tend to be better at mothering, then 2 guys, it might sound sexist, but its pretty much true.
No it is not.
QUOTE
And the if your dads cradle of filths lead singer, thats even worse, lol, its like "What did you do this summer jimmy?" "oh, i just watched my dad kill sheep, praise satan, and have a few blood origys, nothing special"
lol
Can you like, leave the Politics forum forever? And never come back?
Conkerzilla
Sep. 29, 2006. 06:34 PM
QUOTE(Cyrrylia @ Sep. 29, 2006. 06:20 PM) [snapback]9033[/snapback]
QUOTE
i dont meen to be sexist or anything, but im pretty sure girls tend to be better at mothering, then 2 guys, it might sound sexist, but its pretty much true.
No it is not.
QUOTE
And the if your dads cradle of filths lead singer, thats even worse, lol, its like "What did you do this summer jimmy?" "oh, i just watched my dad kill sheep, praise satan, and have a few blood origys, nothing special"
lol
Can you like, leave the Politics forum forever? And never come back?
its my political opinion, so suck kennys balls, suck em dry.
[[.Ami.Rose.]]
Sep. 30, 2006. 04:44 AM
Gay couples should have the same rights as married couples. At the moment, gay people can have ceremonies similar to a wedding and live together etc. as a couple. But if one of them died, the other wouldn't get the life insurance or anything. Their partner is entitled to absolutely nothing that they owned unless it's specifically in a will.
It's so stupid. Just because you don't like someone the same sex as you, shouldn't mean that no one else can. Everyone has a right to their own opinion and gays just get discriminated for theirs. Thank god people are slowly starting to accept them.
Ever seen Brokeback Mountain? It's so sad. </3 I cried.
Cyrrylia
Sep. 30, 2006. 09:52 AM
QUOTE
It's so stupid. Just because you don't like someone the same sex as you, shouldn't mean that no one else can. Everyone has a right to their own opinion and gays just get discriminated for theirs. Thank god people are slowly starting to accept them.
This argument is inconsistent with the argument you put forth in the sex choosing thread.
I suggest either realising you are wrong in that thread, or changing this opinion to reflect that things are "supposed" to be a certain way.
iwannabsmosh
Sep. 30, 2006. 09:59 AM
I've got nothing against gays, it's just what they do. If it were up to me, gay marriage wouldn't be legal. Gays, like everyone else, can keep their private lives "private", hence the name. They can work it out, just like in Philadelphia.
Cyrrylia
Sep. 30, 2006. 10:11 AM
QUOTE
I've got nothing against gays, it's just what they do. If it were up to me, gay marriage wouldn't be legal. Gays, like everyone else, can keep their private lives "private", hence the name. They can work it out, just like in Philadelphia.
With that argument, normal marriage should be illegal too.
Conkerzilla
Sep. 30, 2006. 12:02 PM
QUOTE(Cyrrylia @ Sep. 30, 2006. 11:11 AM) [snapback]9766[/snapback]
QUOTE
I've got nothing against gays, it's just what they do. If it were up to me, gay marriage wouldn't be legal. Gays, like everyone else, can keep their private lives "private", hence the name. They can work it out, just like in Philadelphia.
With that argument, normal marriage should be illegal too.
Marriage is between a man and a woman, gays dont deserve that title, they may have the same rights (except i think its wrong to entrust the life of a child into 2 gay men), but they DONT deserve the title, "Married" was a tterm ment for a man and a woman. Gays should just come up with something else, like "Life Partners" or something.
JackMehoff
Sep. 30, 2006. 12:04 PM
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 30, 2006. 04:02 PM) [snapback]9964[/snapback]
Marriage is between a man and a woman, gays dont deserve that title, they may have the same rights (except i think its wrong to entrust the life of a child into 2 gay men), but they DONT deserve the title, "Married" was a tterm ment for a man and a woman. Gays should just come up with something else, like "Life Partners" or something.
Or butt buddies.
Conkerzilla
Sep. 30, 2006. 12:05 PM
QUOTE(JackMehoff @ Sep. 30, 2006. 01:04 PM) [snapback]9967[/snapback]
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 30, 2006. 04:02 PM) [snapback]9964[/snapback]
Marriage is between a man and a woman, gays dont deserve that title, they may have the same rights (except i think its wrong to entrust the life of a child into 2 gay men), but they DONT deserve the title, "Married" was a tterm ment for a man and a woman. Gays should just come up with something else, like "Life Partners" or something.
Or butt buddies.
hhahahaha, lol, dude thats funny
ThyThoutrust
Sep. 30, 2006. 12:19 PM
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 30, 2006. 12:02 PM) [snapback]9964[/snapback]
QUOTE(Cyrrylia @ Sep. 30, 2006. 11:11 AM) [snapback]9766[/snapback]
QUOTE
I've got nothing against gays, it's just what they do. If it were up to me, gay marriage wouldn't be legal. Gays, like everyone else, can keep their private lives "private", hence the name. They can work it out, just like in Philadelphia.
With that argument, normal marriage should be illegal too.
Marriage is between a man and a woman, gays dont deserve that title, they may have the same rights (except i think its wrong to entrust the life of a child into 2 gay men), but they DONT deserve the title, "Married" was a tterm ment for a man and a woman. Gays should just come up with something else, like "Life Partners" or something.
I disagree, I don't give a shit about a man and a woman that are married so why should I care about 2 men or 2 women getting married?
It just gives people some social advantages.
Conkerzilla
Sep. 30, 2006. 01:32 PM
QUOTE(ThyThoutrust @ Sep. 30, 2006. 01:19 PM) [snapback]9985[/snapback]
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 30, 2006. 12:02 PM) [snapback]9964[/snapback]
QUOTE(Cyrrylia @ Sep. 30, 2006. 11:11 AM) [snapback]9766[/snapback]
QUOTE
I've got nothing against gays, it's just what they do. If it were up to me, gay marriage wouldn't be legal. Gays, like everyone else, can keep their private lives "private", hence the name. They can work it out, just like in Philadelphia.
With that argument, normal marriage should be illegal too.
Marriage is between a man and a woman, gays dont deserve that title, they may have the same rights (except i think its wrong to entrust the life of a child into 2 gay men), but they DONT deserve the title, "Married" was a tterm ment for a man and a woman. Gays should just come up with something else, like "Life Partners" or something.
I disagree, I don't give a shit about a man and a woman that are married so why should I care about 2 men or 2 women getting married?
It just gives people some social advantages.
would you call a wannabe-gangster a gangster? No, they don't deserve the title becaue there not realy a "gangster" Which is why there called posers and wannabe's
Marriage is the legal partnership of a man and a woman, NOT a man and a man, or a woman and a woman. Gay's, homos, lesbians, may deserve the same rights as us all, but shouldnt betreated the same because they are NOT the same, im not saying that there horribale people and they should be discriminated against, but they ARE different, and that needs to be acknwoledged. People shouldnt just pretend that they are the same, they are in-fact DIFFERENT.
ThyThoutrust
Sep. 30, 2006. 02:37 PM
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 30, 2006. 01:32 PM) [snapback]10105[/snapback]
QUOTE(ThyThoutrust @ Sep. 30, 2006. 01:19 PM) [snapback]9985[/snapback]
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 30, 2006. 12:02 PM) [snapback]9964[/snapback]
QUOTE(Cyrrylia @ Sep. 30, 2006. 11:11 AM) [snapback]9766[/snapback]
QUOTE
I've got nothing against gays, it's just what they do. If it were up to me, gay marriage wouldn't be legal. Gays, like everyone else, can keep their private lives "private", hence the name. They can work it out, just like in Philadelphia.
With that argument, normal marriage should be illegal too.
Marriage is between a man and a woman, gays dont deserve that title, they may have the same rights (except i think its wrong to entrust the life of a child into 2 gay men), but they DONT deserve the title, "Married" was a tterm ment for a man and a woman. Gays should just come up with something else, like "Life Partners" or something.
I disagree, I don't give a shit about a man and a woman that are married so why should I care about 2 men or 2 women getting married?
It just gives people some social advantages.
would you call a wannabe-gangster a gangster? No, they don't deserve the title becaue there not realy a "gangster" Which is why there called posers and wannabe's
Marriage is the legal partnership of a man and a woman, NOT a man and a man, or a woman and a woman. Gay's, homos, lesbians, may deserve the same rights as us all, but shouldnt betreated the same because they are NOT the same, im not saying that there horribale people and they should be discriminated against, but they ARE different, and that needs to be acknwoledged. People shouldnt just pretend that they are the same, they are in-fact DIFFERENT.
Marriage isn't related to sexuality. But to religion or to society.
Sure they are different, but it's not related to the legal advantages of getting married and it's sure NOT related to their religion.
Conkerzilla
Sep. 30, 2006. 03:12 PM
QUOTE(ThyThoutrust @ Sep. 30, 2006. 03:37 PM) [snapback]10199[/snapback]
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 30, 2006. 01:32 PM) [snapback]10105[/snapback]
QUOTE(ThyThoutrust @ Sep. 30, 2006. 01:19 PM) [snapback]9985[/snapback]
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 30, 2006. 12:02 PM) [snapback]9964[/snapback]
QUOTE(Cyrrylia @ Sep. 30, 2006. 11:11 AM) [snapback]9766[/snapback]
QUOTE
I've got nothing against gays, it's just what they do. If it were up to me, gay marriage wouldn't be legal. Gays, like everyone else, can keep their private lives "private", hence the name. They can work it out, just like in Philadelphia.
With that argument, normal marriage should be illegal too.
Marriage is between a man and a woman, gays dont deserve that title, they may have the same rights (except i think its wrong to entrust the life of a child into 2 gay men), but they DONT deserve the title, "Married" was a tterm ment for a man and a woman. Gays should just come up with something else, like "Life Partners" or something.
I disagree, I don't give a shit about a man and a woman that are married so why should I care about 2 men or 2 women getting married?
It just gives people some social advantages.
would you call a wannabe-gangster a gangster? No, they don't deserve the title becaue there not realy a "gangster" Which is why there called posers and wannabe's
Marriage is the legal partnership of a man and a woman, NOT a man and a man, or a woman and a woman. Gay's, homos, lesbians, may deserve the same rights as us all, but shouldnt betreated the same because they are NOT the same, im not saying that there horribale people and they should be discriminated against, but they ARE different, and that needs to be acknwoledged. People shouldnt just pretend that they are the same, they are in-fact DIFFERENT.
Marriage isn't related to sexuality. But to religion or to society.
Sure they are different, but it's not related to the legal advantages of getting married and it's sure NOT related to their religion.
(lol, this is one big qoute box) I mean they shouldnt have the same legal "title" they should come up with something elselike "butt-buddies" i guess they shouldnt be given less legel rights (although i still believe 2 gay men cant raise a child) but its just not fair to give them the same title name
Erin
Oct. 1, 2006. 09:10 AM
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 30, 2006. 04:12 PM) [snapback]10269[/snapback]
QUOTE(ThyThoutrust @ Sep. 30, 2006. 03:37 PM) [snapback]10199[/snapback]
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 30, 2006. 01:32 PM) [snapback]10105[/snapback]
QUOTE(ThyThoutrust @ Sep. 30, 2006. 01:19 PM) [snapback]9985[/snapback]
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 30, 2006. 12:02 PM) [snapback]9964[/snapback]
QUOTE(Cyrrylia @ Sep. 30, 2006. 11:11 AM) [snapback]9766[/snapback]
QUOTE
I've got nothing against gays, it's just what they do. If it were up to me, gay marriage wouldn't be legal. Gays, like everyone else, can keep their private lives "private", hence the name. They can work it out, just like in Philadelphia.
With that argument, normal marriage should be illegal too.
Marriage is between a man and a woman, gays dont deserve that title, they may have the same rights (except i think its wrong to entrust the life of a child into 2 gay men), but they DONT deserve the title, "Married" was a tterm ment for a man and a woman. Gays should just come up with something else, like "Life Partners" or something.
I disagree, I don't give a shit about a man and a woman that are married so why should I care about 2 men or 2 women getting married?
It just gives people some social advantages.
would you call a wannabe-gangster a gangster? No, they don't deserve the title becaue there not realy a "gangster" Which is why there called posers and wannabe's
Marriage is the legal partnership of a man and a woman, NOT a man and a man, or a woman and a woman. Gay's, homos, lesbians, may deserve the same rights as us all, but shouldnt betreated the same because they are NOT the same, im not saying that there horribale people and they should be discriminated against, but they ARE different, and that needs to be acknwoledged. People shouldnt just pretend that they are the same, they are in-fact DIFFERENT.
Marriage isn't related to sexuality. But to religion or to society.
Sure they are different, but it's not related to the legal advantages of getting married and it's sure NOT related to their religion.
(lol, this is one big qoute box) I mean they shouldnt have the same legal "title" they should come up with something elselike "butt-buddies" i guess they shouldnt be given less legel rights (although i still believe 2 gay men cant raise a child) but its just not fair to give them the same title name
yup, then people who are vegetarians should not be allowed to shop in the same grocery stores because they are different.
While we are at it, people of different religions...man they should just go live in their own state. Damn those different people.
At this point in time, I don't think that the world is ready to accept openly gay people. I love gay people. I have talked to my good friend about the marriage thing, and he said that he doesn't feel it neccessary to have a ring and a piece of paper to prove his love for his boyfriend. But you know what...some people do.
I could easily just live with a guy my entire life, and never be married. But people get married for different reasons. A lot of the time, the benefits of a marriage when it comes to tax relief is a pretty big deal.
Why should gay people have to pay more money because they aren't married...they are 'life partners' fuck that shit. let them be married. they are humans too.
Conkerzilla
Oct. 1, 2006. 06:18 PM
QUOTE(Erin @ Oct. 1, 2006. 10:10 AM) [snapback]11614[/snapback]
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 30, 2006. 04:12 PM) [snapback]10269[/snapback]
QUOTE(ThyThoutrust @ Sep. 30, 2006. 03:37 PM) [snapback]10199[/snapback]
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 30, 2006. 01:32 PM) [snapback]10105[/snapback]
QUOTE(ThyThoutrust @ Sep. 30, 2006. 01:19 PM) [snapback]9985[/snapback]
QUOTE(Conkerzilla @ Sep. 30, 2006. 12:02 PM) [snapback]9964[/snapback]
QUOTE(Cyrrylia @ Sep. 30, 2006. 11:11 AM) [snapback]9766[/snapback]
QUOTE
I've got nothing against gays, it's just what they do. If it were up to me, gay marriage wouldn't be legal. Gays, like everyone else, can keep their private lives "private", hence the name. They can work it out, just like in Philadelphia.
With that argument, normal marriage should be illegal too.
Marriage is between a man and a woman, gays dont deserve that title, they may have the same rights (except i think its wrong to entrust the life of a child into 2 gay men), but they DONT deserve the title, "Married" was a tterm ment for a man and a woman. Gays should just come up with something else, like "Life Partners" or something.
I disagree, I don't give a shit about a man and a woman that are married so why should I care about 2 men or 2 women getting married?
It just gives people some social advantages.
would you call a wannabe-gangster a gangster? No, they don't deserve the title becaue there not realy a "gangster" Which is why there called posers and wannabe's
Marriage is the legal partnership of a man and a woman, NOT a man and a man, or a woman and a woman. Gay's, homos, lesbians, may deserve the same rights as us all, but shouldnt betreated the same because they are NOT the same, im not saying that there horribale people and they should be discriminated against, but they ARE different, and that needs to be acknwoledged. People shouldnt just pretend that they are the same, they are in-fact DIFFERENT.
Marriage isn't related to sexuality. But to religion or to society.
Sure they are different, but it's not related to the legal advantages of getting married and it's sure NOT related to their religion.
(lol, this is one big qoute box) I mean they shouldnt have the same legal "title" they should come up with something elselike "butt-buddies" i guess they shouldnt be given less legel rights (although i still believe 2 gay men cant raise a child) but its just not fair to give them the same title name
yup, then people who are vegetarians should not be allowed to shop in the same grocery stores because they are different.
While we are at it, people of different religions...man they should just go live in their own state. Damn those different people.
At this point in time, I don't think that the world is ready to accept openly gay people. I love gay people. I have talked to my good friend about the marriage thing, and he said that he doesn't feel it neccessary to have a ring and a piece of paper to prove his love for his boyfriend. But you know what...some people do.
I could easily just live with a guy my entire life, and never be married. But people get married for different reasons. A lot of the time, the benefits of a marriage when it comes to tax relief is a pretty big deal.
Why should gay people have to pay more money because they aren't married...they are 'life partners' fuck that shit. let them be married. they are humans too.
I just meant it shouldnt be the same title, they can have the same rights, they shouldnt be discriminated against or anything, if some one of a different sexuality realy wants to get married for "tax relief" then they wouldnt mind having it be called something different
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.