what do you think about asexuals?
if someone not understand, asexual is a person who not have have sexual attraction at all, but he can fall in love. therefore there is asexual-straight, asexual-gay, and so forth...
so what do you think about that?...love without physical closeness? or person who dont feel sexual and emotionally attraction simultaneously?

its pretty lame

I don't think there's anything wrong with it, I just think it's wired because I think that the main reason that you notice someone in the first place is that you are attracted to them.

I seriously don't think that's possible...

I mean, sure, there might be some out there, but I can NOT see how it works.

Such blasphemy.

I would have to agree with Boxiom.

Do they fall in love with animals too?

why blasphemy? they can build a family..asex pair, but without sex...

But still, that's just like saying you can have sex...but you can't enjoy it.

Asexualaity

isnt that what love is by definition? sex? that's the whole point! To reproduce!

Please tell me you're joking about that one

"What are they calling these gays nowadays? Bisexuals? You either suck cock or you don't. Their's no flip-flopping neccessary. Stupid cocksuckers." - A.D.C.

LMFAO!!!

So anyway, what is there to do for an asexual person then? Have a conversation? Are you kidding me??

YOu know wats weird? i was told at a very young age (kindergarde) that asexual was a guy wants to stick their penis up a bunny's ass, and i didnt think much of it, and i only figured out wat it realy was by seing this movie, and my bro called the main character asexual, and i said"wtf? that guy never got freaky with a fucking bunny!" and he was like "what? asexual means blah blah blah" and i was like "oh"

I used to think asexual meant you had boy and girl parts and were able to have sex with yourself.

LOL, that was in a episode of family guy i think

Guy: Hey grandma, i got my penis stuck in my vagina last night

Grandma: WHAAAAT? You have both?

Guy: Ya, Doesn't everybody?




hahahahaha, that episode kicked ass

Can hermaphrodites have babies with themselves?

that was in an episode of southpark, cartman's mom, is realy cartman's dad,

i dont think about asexuals.

Thats what it is with plants or some shit

I don't think being asexual means you don't enjoy sex. I'm sure asexual people can still have orgasms.

And whoever asked if hermaphrodites can have babies with themselves, I don't think they can since neither of their organs are usually fully developed. I think it's basically a vagina with a small penis coming out at the top instead of a clitoris. Kinda gross but I don't think they are able to reproduce at all.

there are 3 types of hermaphrodites. the ore male, the more female, and the "true" hermaphrodites. the male one has female parts but the sex organs dont work and are like shriveled, his male parts are fine. the femal is the exact opposite of the male. true hermaphrodites have both parts working normally so technically they can have a baby with themselves though it probably wont make it past a zygote, or be like a mutant baby or something. i learned this in high school... my teacher was weird

It'd be kinda tough for someone to have sex with themself. They'd have to bend their boner like 180 degrees into the vagina. I think it'd be very painful.

Yeah but his mom didn't necessarily reproduce with herself. When they found out she was the "dad" then it was like "Wait, so then whos my mom?!"

lol this reminds me of Donnie Darko
Donnie: [shouts] First of all, Papa Smurf didn't create Smurfette. Gargamel did. She was sent in as Gargamel's evil spy with the intention of destroying the Smurf village. But the overwhelming goodness of the Smurf way of life transformed her. And as for the whole gang-bang scenario, it just couldn't happen. Smurfs are asexual. They don't even have... reproductive organs under those little, white pants. It's just so illogical, you know, about being a Smurf. You know, what's the point of living... if you don't have a dick?

asexuals are pussies. not worse than gay people, but still, pretty lame.

bigot

I'm the opposite of asexuals. I can't fall in love, but I can have secks with them o_O

mmmm but its exactly like you saying..they can have sex but they cant enjoy it...
but there is asexs who want's build a familiy...like anybodey else...

Sure they can build a family, but see, their love is only considered as a friendly type of love. A friend or a family member are considered as people who you are emotionally attracted to, but you don't feel sexual with. True love between a couple is expressed passionately, and there's no doubt that they are sharing an intimate relationship - romantic love, it's called. So basically, asexuals cannot love romantically, since it involves both emotional and sexual desire. Therefore, they're not really loving in the right context of a coupled relationship.

I take it you've never been in love?

yea. thats probably why I thought it was the same as humans.

What makes you say that?

do they not have sex? their lives must be rather boring...

well , it`s kinda strange not to have sexual attraction at all , and even stranger to be able to fall in love . i mean , how in the name of god you`l have kids , if none sexual attraction? just do `em in a botle in a lab or somethin? strange people....

When you are in love with someone, it's not just you are attracted to taht person sexually. It's not the same love and loving a family member or friend. There is a difference between loving someone and being IN love with someone. When you are in love with someone, taht person could get in an accident and lose all sexual organs and you wouldn't love them any less. You don't NEED sex to be IN love with someone. Love just makes sex so much more amazing. That's why sex is usually so important in relationships. It doesn't mean that without the sex your relationship isn't romantic.



There are stages of life when people don't have sex and their lives isn't boring. If they don't crave sex then it doesn't bother them. When you were a kid you didn't want sex and I'm sure your life wasn't boring.

true, this my dear is very true.

totally agree..that's what i trying to say...romantic attraction and sexsual attraction its 2 different things...they dont must to come together...and whan someone saying "life without sex is boring/lame"
its just from his point of view, because the asex dont want sex and dont feel attraction...

yeah you dont need sex to be in love with someone but i do think a certain sexual attraction is present when you are in love with someone. Sexual desire or having actual sex is not completly nessecary yet i believe to be in love with someone also means, wanting to be close to someone in forms of touching and kissing.

now, i dont know if asexuals have that desire.

and where is the family there?

i think it's just a stupid trend or something like that

It's not a trend. It's sexuality... or the lack of one. It's not a choice they make.

No, you're right. Technically, you don't need sex to have a relationship. But there has to be some sexual attraction. Sure you can fall in love without sex - that's the emotional aspect of a relationship. However, usually when a situation occurs, like what you said about a person losing all sexual organs - well, the majority of these couples have gone beyond love, because their love has been strengthen by their past and intimacy with one another. They've already escalated to a level where nothing else matters but having their partner by their side for the rest of their life.



Still, I can't help but feel like I'm missing something if I can't have a sexual relationship when I'm in love. I would need both emotional and sexual to balance it out. But that's just me.



And you've guessed right. I've never been in love. They always end up cheating on me with some other slut. Just because I refuse to have sex. Not because I'm asexual. But more because I know that they're using me.

asexs can make a sex for children...but they dont must to do sex for pleasure...'cause there is no pleasure

See I agree with you taht when people want sex and they don't get it, it does hurt the relationship. But when neither of the partners really want sex, it doesn't bother them at all and their love is purely emotional (but still different from family and friends)

if they really love, they can wait with the sex...and its not need to disturb

It's not about waiting though.
It's about never having it.
Why have something you don't want?
So how can they build a family?
I imagine they want to... But they're not bothered about sex.
Basically, this whole thing has confused me.
I don't know if it's because I'm a horny teenager or whatever, but I can't see how a relationship without sexual attraction can work.

What if they want a family?

a relationship without sexual attraction can't work if the couple wants sex, but if they're asexual it doesn't bother them.

i replied to "Leepay"...its not about asex..
and like you saying. asex dont want sex but they can build a family, they can do it for children...although its not enjoyable...mmm and 1 more thing i pay attention to, the asex are gay friendly..not like straight girl for example, who dont have problem with gays but she have a problem with lesbians

I'm not asex, I'm gay friendly.
Hmph.

but there is lot of straight who not...they ashamed to be firend of feminine guys...most of them..