Kristandex
Aug. 20, 2007. 05:08 AM
Official Rules
1. You must have at least 50 posts to enter and vote
2. Your signature must not be pre-made.
3. Your signature must follow the assigned theme.
4. Your signature must be your own work. If you are asked to prove the authenticity of your entry, you must do so.
5. Your signature must include your name in some way, shape, or form. Not required this week.
6. Your signature must be of a reasonable size (rectangular in shape with a maximum width of 555px and a maximum height of 400px). If you are asked to resize your signature, you must do so.
7. You may only post one entry in one post, and any further changes to your entry must be posted in replacement of your original entry. All changes made to any post other than your original entry post will be ignored.
8. You may not vote for yourself in the voting thread.
Failure to adhere to any of these rules will result in the disqualification of your entry.
This week's theme is... Cinema
The deadline is this Friday at 5:59 PM (PST). This is a strict deadline.
kingofcolorado97
Aug. 20, 2007. 05:09 AM
YAY!!!!
A great theme kristin!!
i'llk start working on mine now
mccloud
Aug. 20, 2007. 05:13 AM
so it's like a movie scene or whatever?
mt_mega
Aug. 20, 2007. 05:13 AM
I hate this theme. I won't be participating this week.
I kid.
hypnox
Aug. 20, 2007. 05:27 AM
Ohh.. I can't wait to get Photoshop CS3.
Gerian
Aug. 20, 2007. 05:46 AM
Great theme.
I think I'll do the POTC..

Edit:
I don't like it at all. I think I'll start over..
Edit: Ice Age.
kingofcolorado97
Aug. 20, 2007. 06:06 AM
QUOTE(Gerian @ Aug. 20, 2007. 09:45 AM) [snapback]535290[/snapback]
Great theme.
I think I'll do the POTC..

Edit:

I don't like it at all. I think I'll start over..
name is not required
Bluejam
Aug. 20, 2007. 06:09 AM
Did you make the background?
Gerian
Aug. 20, 2007. 06:12 AM
QUOTE(kingofcolorado97 @ Aug. 20, 2007. 02:05 PM) [snapback]535321[/snapback]
QUOTE(Gerian @ Aug. 20, 2007. 09:45 AM) [snapback]535290[/snapback]
Great theme.
I think I'll do the POTC..

Edit:

I don't like it at all. I think I'll start over..
name is not required
I hadn't read that, Yay!
spence3020
Aug. 20, 2007. 06:12 AM
MY FINAL for now . . .
Leepay
Aug. 20, 2007. 06:21 AM
Name is not required but you can still put your name on your sig.
spence3020
Aug. 20, 2007. 06:22 AM
QUOTE(Leepay @ Aug. 20, 2007. 10:20 AM) [snapback]535340[/snapback]
Name is not required but you can still put your name on your sig.
"its not required" not "not allowed"
kingofcolorado97
Aug. 20, 2007. 06:22 AM
i have this so far (i no its crappy):

suggestions?
Leepay
Aug. 20, 2007. 06:23 AM
QUOTE(kingofcolorado97 @ Aug. 20, 2007. 10:22 AM) [snapback]535343[/snapback]
i have this so far (i no its crappy):

suggestions?
What have you done to it so far? It looks exactly like the movie poster.
I found this on google
fluer
Aug. 20, 2007. 06:24 AM
Lighting.
pink ponck
Aug. 20, 2007. 06:28 AM
here is my entry:
kingofcolorado97
Aug. 20, 2007. 06:28 AM
QUOTE(Leepay @ Aug. 20, 2007. 10:23 AM) [snapback]535346[/snapback]
QUOTE(kingofcolorado97 @ Aug. 20, 2007. 10:22 AM) [snapback]535343[/snapback]
i have this so far (i no its crappy):

suggestions?
What have you done to it so far? It looks exactly like the movie poster.
the movie poster was huge so i made it smaller and took out the writing
[spoiler]

[/spoiler]
OzRocks
Aug. 20, 2007. 06:29 AM
QUOTE(kingofcolorado97 @ Aug. 21, 2007. 12:28 AM) [snapback]535351[/snapback]
QUOTE(Leepay @ Aug. 20, 2007. 10:23 AM) [snapback]535346[/snapback]
QUOTE(kingofcolorado97 @ Aug. 20, 2007. 10:22 AM) [snapback]535343[/snapback]
i have this so far (i no its crappy):

suggestions?
What have you done to it so far? It looks exactly like the movie poster.
the movie poster was huge so i made it smaller and took out the writing
[spoiler]

[/spoiler]
Haha you want people to tell you how to do it then??
Leepay
Aug. 20, 2007. 06:31 AM
Well so far you shrunk it and cropped it. So you didn't really do anything at all. Everyone shrinks and crops images they use. Ask for suggestions after you actually do something to it.
kingofcolorado97
Aug. 20, 2007. 06:33 AM
QUOTE(OzRocks @ Aug. 20, 2007. 10:29 AM) [snapback]535353[/snapback]
Haha you want people to tell you how to do it then??
no just suggest something and i'll try it
QUOTE(Leepay @ Aug. 20, 2007. 10:30 AM) [snapback]535356[/snapback]
Well so far you shrunk it and cropped it. So you didn't really do anything at all. Everyone shrinks and crops images they use. Ask for suggestions after you actually do something to it.
gahh ok but i can think of anything
spence3020
Aug. 20, 2007. 07:48 AM
my ide isnt working cvant find any pictures so i need a new idea
thesimplicity of my own entry makes me barf i hate it
edit: deleted
pink ponck
Aug. 20, 2007. 08:09 AM
Wait, can we add our name if we want to?
spence3020
Aug. 20, 2007. 08:11 AM
QUOTE(spence3020 @ Aug. 20, 2007. 10:21 AM) [snapback]535342[/snapback]
QUOTE(Leepay @ Aug. 20, 2007. 10:20 AM) [snapback]535340[/snapback]
Name is not required but you can still put your name on your sig.
"its not required" not "not allowed"
Gerian
Aug. 20, 2007. 08:11 AM
QUOTE(pink ponck @ Aug. 20, 2007. 04:09 PM) [snapback]535535[/snapback]
Wait, can we add our name if we want to?
yes
Kristandex
Aug. 20, 2007. 08:19 AM
QUOTE(pink ponck @ Aug. 20, 2007. 12:09 PM) [snapback]535535[/snapback]
Wait, can we add our name if we want to?
Yes. It's not
required, so it's still allowed.
BasketCase
Aug. 20, 2007. 08:19 AM
fluer
Aug. 20, 2007. 08:21 AM
Cinema is a very wide subject. You don't have to a fan of movies.
hypnox
Aug. 20, 2007. 08:38 AM
My entry.
Bluejam
Aug. 20, 2007. 09:22 AM
youbetterthanjackass
Aug. 20, 2007. 09:37 AM
well, my sig isn`t related to a movie in general . the theme is CINEMA - not MOVIES (or what ever)

i did spent a long time making it, but it`s not perfect , but i`m sick of animating that film
spence3020
Aug. 20, 2007. 09:49 AM
QUOTE(youbetterthanjackass @ Aug. 20, 2007. 01:36 PM) [snapback]535661[/snapback]
well, my sig isn`t related to a movie in general . the theme is CINEMA - not MOVIES (or what ever)

i did spent a long time making it, but it`s not perfect , but i`m sick of animating that film
thats awesome. what program didi you use for the motion
youbetterthanjackass
Aug. 20, 2007. 09:52 AM
QUOTE(spence3020 @ Aug. 20, 2007. 08:49 PM) [snapback]535674[/snapback]
QUOTE(youbetterthanjackass @ Aug. 20, 2007. 01:36 PM) [snapback]535661[/snapback]
well, my sig isn`t related to a movie in general . the theme is CINEMA - not MOVIES (or what ever)

i did spent a long time making it, but it`s not perfect , but i`m sick of animating that film
thats awesome. what program didi you use for the motion
Jasc Animation Shop
it`s a pretty easy to use software, but i suck at it ... i know just the basics
spence3020
Aug. 20, 2007. 09:53 AM
QUOTE(youbetterthanjackass @ Aug. 20, 2007. 01:51 PM) [snapback]535678[/snapback]
QUOTE(spence3020 @ Aug. 20, 2007. 08:49 PM) [snapback]535674[/snapback]
QUOTE(youbetterthanjackass @ Aug. 20, 2007. 01:36 PM) [snapback]535661[/snapback]
well, my sig isn`t related to a movie in general . the theme is CINEMA - not MOVIES (or what ever)

i did spent a long time making it, but it`s not perfect , but i`m sick of animating that film
thats awesome. what program didi you use for the motion
Jasc Animation Shop
it`s a pretty easy to use software, but i suck at it ... i know just the basics
is it for macs?
youbetterthanjackass
Aug. 20, 2007. 09:55 AM
QUOTE(spence3020 @ Aug. 20, 2007. 08:53 PM) [snapback]535680[/snapback]
is it for macs?
dno, i have a PC, just google it, it might run on macs to
kingofcolorado97
Aug. 20, 2007. 10:45 AM
here is my final copy:

it is my first sig with photoshop, so it is not that good.
JaGuAr3529
Aug. 20, 2007. 10:46 AM
No name required:
1. It's easier for people to rip signatures off of others
2. Voters can see which entry belongs to which entrant anyways by looking at this thread
3. It goes against virtually all significant competitions
4. It doesn't make any sense
-smosh-fan-
Aug. 20, 2007. 10:46 AM
Great theme!
youbetterthanjackass
Aug. 20, 2007. 10:50 AM
QUOTE(JaGuAr3529 @ Aug. 20, 2007. 09:45 PM) [snapback]535747[/snapback]
No name required:
1. It's easier for people to rip signatures off of others
2. Voters can see which entry belongs to which entrant anyways by looking at this thread
3. It goes against virtually all significant competitions
4. It doesn't make any sense
so lost 1 hour of my life for nothing ? ... let it be dude.
or not, it`s still a good time to change the theme . people are posting movie posters - thats the only bad thing.
JackMehoff
Aug. 20, 2007. 11:05 AM
Bluejam
Aug. 20, 2007. 11:06 AM
i dont see the point in it either,jag... But kristen and fluer think they will get more votes this way
JaGuAr3529
Aug. 20, 2007. 11:29 AM
QUOTE(Bluejam @ Aug. 20, 2007. 12:05 PM) [snapback]535790[/snapback]
i dont see the point in it either,jag... But kristen and fluer think they will get more votes this way
Name recognition by voters might help certain entrants because they're well known, but it can also
hurt those same entrants because a voter might decide not to vote for someone who wins a lot. It works both ways.
The best way to get legitimate votes is to create a signature that's appealing to lots of people.
smoshman111
Aug. 20, 2007. 11:31 AM
hi
JaGuAr3529
Aug. 20, 2007. 11:44 AM
QUOTE(smoshman111 @ Aug. 20, 2007. 12:30 PM) [snapback]535810[/snapback]
hi
Hi, keep it up and you'll get another warning.
emoangelxoxo8
Aug. 20, 2007. 11:50 AM
smoshman111
Bluejam
Aug. 20, 2007. 11:55 AM
There has never been a week where someone won without deserving it!
I dont get why we have to take all this so seriously and make a big deal out of it - It's all just for fun ... There is an argument going on in these sotw threads every fucking week!
Kristandex
Aug. 20, 2007. 12:22 PM
QUOTE(JaGuAr3529 @ Aug. 20, 2007. 02:45 PM) [snapback]535747[/snapback]
No name required:
1. It's easier for people to rip signatures off of others
2. Voters can see which entry belongs to which entrant anyways by looking at this thread
3. It goes against virtually all significant competitions
4. It doesn't make any sense
A few people complained about the name requirement, so we're giving it a try this week without the rule. If it gives any problems (which I'm assuming it will), we're going back to the way it was.
QUOTE(Bluejam @ Aug. 20, 2007. 03:05 PM) [snapback]535790[/snapback]
i dont see the point in it either,jag... But kristen and fluer think they will get more votes this way
When did I say that?
funnyman2
Aug. 20, 2007. 12:24 PM
QUOTE(Kristandex @ Aug. 20, 2007. 04:22 PM) [snapback]535886[/snapback]
QUOTE(JaGuAr3529 @ Aug. 20, 2007. 02:45 PM) [snapback]535747[/snapback]
No name required:
1. It's easier for people to rip signatures off of others
2. Voters can see which entry belongs to which entrant anyways by looking at this thread
3. It goes against virtually all significant competitions
4. It doesn't make any sense
A few people complained about the name requirement, so we're giving it a try this week without the rule. If it gives any problems (which I'm assuming it will), we're going back to the way it was.
QUOTE(Bluejam @ Aug. 20, 2007. 03:05 PM) [snapback]535790[/snapback]
i dont see the point in it either,jag... But kristen and fluer think they will get more votes this way
When did I say that?
I'm pretty sure the following will happen.
1.A person will post an unfinished entry and it will be stolen by someone.
2.That person will post it first.
3.The original artist will be blamed.
mikeshox
Aug. 20, 2007. 12:27 PM
QUOTE(funnyman2 @ Aug. 20, 2007. 05:24 PM) [snapback]535892[/snapback]
I'm pretty sure the following will happen.
1.A person will post an unfinished entry and it will be stolen by someone.
2.That person will post it first.
3.The original artist will be blamed.
NOt happening to me since my entries SUCK!
SheSaidxENDLESSLY
Aug. 20, 2007. 12:28 PM
Spot.
This no name thing is not going to work out...
smosherrama
Aug. 20, 2007. 01:35 PM
YOUBETTERTHANJACKASS!!!!
my love<3
lol
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.