QUOTE(Perfect Crime @ Nov. 16, 2008. 08:33 AM) [snapback]1300521[/snapback]
They cut off the tops of his fingers
Pulle doff his fingernails with plyers
Taught their dog to bite him
And the dad punched him so hard in the face a tooth was found in his stomach
Not to mention he Broke the childs back..

Also i really like the peopel on this site but what's pissing me off is that some people are trying to act like it completely is no big deal when it is. This child had over 60 visits from a social wokrer including when he was paralysed with his broken back, the childs doctor couldnt even tell he had injusries (including a fucking broken back) and is still allowed to practice.
This whole story is just completely disgusting. But in the articles I read about this yesterday, it said the dad had nothing to do with it. I don't think he even lived with the mom. The two men responsible for it are just two random guys the mom is friends with. the dad didn't even know his son was being abused because the mom kept it hidden so long, even trying to hide the abuse after the child's death. And I think they finally did take away that pediatrician's license.
here is a section from the article about the doctor:
QUOTE
THE PAEDIATRICIAN: DR SABAH AL-ZAYYAT
The locum doctor who examined Baby P two days before his death has been suspended from working with children and is facing a General Medical Council investigation over claims she missed his horrific injuries.
The Old Bailey heard the boy's ribs were already broken when Sabah Al-Zayyat examined him at St Ann's Hospital in Tottenham and that his spine had 'probably' already been snapped, leaving him semi-paralysed.
The Saudi Arabian consultant paediatrician, 52, said she was not told of any child protection concerns about the toddler and was only given a referral letter from Haringey social services asking for an assessment.
Dr Al-Zayyat, of Ilford, East London, who has worked at world renowned children's hospital Great Ormond Street, denied claims she had abandoned her examination after five minutes and insisted she had been thorough.
But the court heard she decided against a full examination because the boy was 'miserable and cranky'.
In addition, a family friend, asked to look after the boy on two occasions by social services, told the court the boy cried so much he had to be taken out of the room.
source:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10...utal-death.html