QUOTE
Of course it was vague. Am I supposed to know all the billions of reasons for which people might subscribe to Smosh? My point is that people on YouTube in general like them. I already elaborated on why I, personally, subscribed to Smosh (and not nigahiga or Fred), but that's my own opinion.
And hey, I'm not quite that desperate for Smosh to keep number three on YouTube. Whether Fred or nigahiga or some other dumbass has more subscribers than them won't stop a lot of people from watching their videos. Smosh is a longstanding entity on YouTube, so I don't think they're going to slip down in the rankings that easily. If they do, fine. But we already know that subscribers on YouTube aren't particularly bright, so it doesn't necessarily mean much if they lose that number three spot. I'll respect your opinion if you don't think Smosh is funny, but you haven't provided many decent points for that argument.
I was going to dissect this entire post, but then I saw the bolded section.
What makes you think, in this case, that smosh is any different? They get subscriptions everyday, probably the same people who subscribe to Nigahiga or Fred. I'm allowed to use this logic, because as you said, subscribers on Youtube aren't particularly bright.
You can say it's the quality of their videos. If anybody has ANY perception of what satire is, you'd know that Fred can do it better than smosh.
This doesn't mean Fred is good. In fact, he's pretty bad at that too. But hey, when you watch them side-by-side, you'll see that. A lot of people might argue Fred is one-dimensional. What do you expect him to do, build a fu
cking web out of such a simple premise? smosh don't tie any ideas together. Aside from 'Food Battle' and stuff like that, and you can see how brilliantly those turn out.
And you know what? You can argue that this is all nonsense. Who am I to say smosh are in fact more generic than the people preceding them? Who am I to say that even though smosh have been on Youtube for longer, that doesn't mean that anything they do is better than their generic contemporaries? Who am I to say that new users make videos with ten times the writing ability, ten times the production, ten times the humor? Who am I to say that just because smosh had something, it doesn't mean they deserve it? You can just argue that I have an opinion, and this is all subjective. That I just don't like 'smosh'. That's it, right? It's not that smosh is bad. I just don't like them. Now when you don't like Fred, he's bad! But that's okay. What's the name of this website again? That's what I thought. When your arguments are weak, it's never certainty. It's just 'Well I kinda feel like this...'
Well who am I? I guess, I'm a subscriber on Youtube and I'm just not particularly bright.
For the record, I'm on this website for the community (mainly a nostalgia of what the community used to be before the website committed suicide), as are a lot of long-time users on this site. I'll admit I haven't been here long, but I know why I am. And it's most certainly not for the videos.
PS, I provided probably the easiest and strongest argument possible in my first post, so your 'You don't have any arguments' rah rah bullsh
it won't work here. Look at the world. Honestly, put down whatever trend you're into now, and back up. Think about how, in reality, within a few years, maybe even months, it's going to dissipate. Times change more than trends, but just barely.